<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All your darkmatter are belong to unparticles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/</link>
	<description>Blogging one sidereal day at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:49:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tatsuru Kikuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-22670</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatsuru Kikuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-22670</guid>
		<description>Hi Pamela,

If you are still interested in our work, please let see my talk at the international workshop on the Grand Unified Theories:

http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=87&amp;sessionId=1&amp;resId=0&amp;materialId=slides&amp;confId=19791

or given at the KEK Annual Theory Meeting on Particle Physics Phenomenology:

http://research.kek.jp/group/riron/workshop/KEKPH0712/Dec14/14.10.Kikuchi.pdf

Tatsuru Kikuchi
–
Theory Group, KEK
1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, JAPAN
E-mail: tatsuru_at_post.kek.jp (”_at_” has to be replaced by @)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pamela,</p>
<p>If you are still interested in our work, please let see my talk at the international workshop on the Grand Unified Theories:</p>
<p><a href="http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=87&amp;sessionId=1&amp;resId=0&amp;materialId=slides&amp;confId=19791" rel="nofollow">http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=87&amp;sessionId=1&amp;resId=0&amp;materialId=slides&amp;confId=19791</a></p>
<p>or given at the KEK Annual Theory Meeting on Particle Physics Phenomenology:</p>
<p><a href="http://research.kek.jp/group/riron/workshop/KEKPH0712/Dec14/14.10.Kikuchi.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://research.kek.jp/group/riron/workshop/KEKPH0712/Dec14/14.10.Kikuchi.pdf</a></p>
<p>Tatsuru Kikuchi<br />
–<br />
Theory Group, KEK<br />
1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, JAPAN<br />
E-mail: tatsuru_at_post.kek.jp (”_at_” has to be replaced by @)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatsuru Kikuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-22669</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatsuru Kikuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-22669</guid>
		<description>Hi Pamela,

Thanks for this interesting post and advertising our paper!

Indeed, a few months ago, we have proposed a possibility for the unparticle as a candidate of the Dark Matter.
----------------------------------- 
Tatsuru Kikuchi and Nobuchika Okada
``Unparticle Dark Matter&#039;&#039;
arXiv:0711.1506 [hep-ph].
-----------------------------------
I think this is the first paper that tried to explain the dark matter in terms of the unparticle. Basically, the conclusion is as follows: it is indeed possible to explain the observed dark matter relic abundance in terms of unparticle by itself; it is so amazing and so interesting.

Tatsuru Kikuchi
-- 
Theory Group, KEK
1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, JAPAN
E-mail: tatsuru_at_post.kek.jp (&quot;_at_&quot; has to be replaced by @)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pamela,</p>
<p>Thanks for this interesting post and advertising our paper!</p>
<p>Indeed, a few months ago, we have proposed a possibility for the unparticle as a candidate of the Dark Matter.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Tatsuru Kikuchi and Nobuchika Okada<br />
&#8220;Unparticle Dark Matter&#8221;<br />
arXiv:0711.1506 [hep-ph].<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
I think this is the first paper that tried to explain the dark matter in terms of the unparticle. Basically, the conclusion is as follows: it is indeed possible to explain the observed dark matter relic abundance in terms of unparticle by itself; it is so amazing and so interesting.</p>
<p>Tatsuru Kikuchi<br />
&#8211;<br />
Theory Group, KEK<br />
1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, JAPAN<br />
E-mail: tatsuru_at_post.kek.jp (&#8221;_at_&#8221; has to be replaced by @)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZZMike</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-17281</link>
		<dc:creator>ZZMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-17281</guid>
		<description>If there are unparticles, must there be anti-unparticles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are unparticles, must there be anti-unparticles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burzycki.org - Tech and Interesting Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-16585</link>
		<dc:creator>Burzycki.org - Tech and Interesting Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-16585</guid>
		<description>[...] wings, so why wasn&#039;t there more press about it? Pamela Gay translates some astro-gibberish into a really interesting scientific result. The Angry Astronomer got a great post about the power of Big Sky [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wings, so why wasn&#8217;t there more press about it? Pamela Gay translates some astro-gibberish into a really interesting scientific result. The Angry Astronomer got a great post about the power of Big Sky [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-16193</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-16193</guid>
		<description>Science is definitely a good place to find bad English!

Oddly enough, of the several papers I&#039;ve published I had my first ever experience of having real English grammar editing with my latest paper due out shortly in Astrobiology (http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4274).

I gave my style manual a workout looking up &quot;dangling participle&quot;, &quot;split infinitive&quot; and other dastardly terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science is definitely a good place to find bad English!</p>
<p>Oddly enough, of the several papers I&#8217;ve published I had my first ever experience of having real English grammar editing with my latest paper due out shortly in Astrobiology (<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4274)" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4274)</a>.</p>
<p>I gave my style manual a workout looking up &#8220;dangling participle&#8221;, &#8220;split infinitive&#8221; and other dastardly terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-15932</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-15932</guid>
		<description>Hi Pamela,

Thanks for this interesting post. I have to admit though I don&#039;t find the unparticle idea particularly compelling. Possible phenomenology isn&#039;t the only thing that matters. I have had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/09/unparticles.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;brief post on the Unparticles in September&lt;/a&gt;. Best,

B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pamela,</p>
<p>Thanks for this interesting post. I have to admit though I don&#8217;t find the unparticle idea particularly compelling. Possible phenomenology isn&#8217;t the only thing that matters. I have had a <a href="http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/09/unparticles.html" rel="nofollow">brief post on the Unparticles in September</a>. Best,</p>
<p>B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-15551</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-15551</guid>
		<description>Thanks for unravelling that for us Pamela.  the last frontier still remains just that, an unknown frontier with many secrets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for unravelling that for us Pamela.  the last frontier still remains just that, an unknown frontier with many secrets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Atherton</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-15536</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Atherton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-15536</guid>
		<description>As long as the LHC isn&#039;t

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30420</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the LHC isn&#8217;t</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30420" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30420</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Schrauwen</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-15452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Schrauwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-15452</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah I can&#039;t wait for the LHC either, I at CERN this august and man its impressive!

Here is a picture of the atlast detector I took when I was there:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sjorge/1223836735/in/set-72157601580935712/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah I can&#8217;t wait for the LHC either, I at CERN this august and man its impressive!</p>
<p>Here is a picture of the atlast detector I took when I was there:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sjorge/1223836735/in/set-72157601580935712/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/sjorge/1223836735/in/set-72157601580935712/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Kinne</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-15363</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Kinne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-15363</guid>
		<description>You know, the more I read and talk (turns out that one of the current researchers at CERN was one of the &quot;brat kids&quot; that ran around the Engineering Division of USS Accord) the more I see that a whole hell of a lot of hopes are being pinned on the LHC. I hope it can deliver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the more I read and talk (turns out that one of the current researchers at CERN was one of the &#8220;brat kids&#8221; that ran around the Engineering Division of USS Accord) the more I see that a whole hell of a lot of hopes are being pinned on the LHC. I hope it can deliver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freiddie</title>
		<link>http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/comment-page-1/#comment-15339</link>
		<dc:creator>Freiddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starstryder.com/2007/11/16/all-your-darkmatter-are-belong-to-unparticles/#comment-15339</guid>
		<description>So that&#039;s why the title sounds so familiar!
I can&#039;t wait for LHC either. I really want to know if Higgs bosons exist. (And I also &#039;read&#039; somewhere, though I might have a bad memory, that LHC might create mini-black holes from proton-proton collisions)
As for math, I think there&#039;s a universe of its own. I used to find disassembling the dy and dx odd, but now it&#039;s sleight of hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#8217;s why the title sounds so familiar!<br />
I can&#8217;t wait for LHC either. I really want to know if Higgs bosons exist. (And I also &#8216;read&#8217; somewhere, though I might have a bad memory, that LHC might create mini-black holes from proton-proton collisions)<br />
As for math, I think there&#8217;s a universe of its own. I used to find disassembling the dy and dx odd, but now it&#8217;s sleight of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
