This Sunday, January 19, 2020, after multiple weather-related delays, SpaceX was able to launch a 3-time used Falcon 9 from Kennedy Space Center’s launch pad 39A. Atop this rocket was a Crew Dragon capsule containing two mannequins and a whole lot of sensors. This wasn’t a normal launch; this was the inflight abort test many of us have been waiting months to see.
Less than 2 minutes after launch, and after sustaining Max Q (that point in flight when the rocket experiences maximum dynamic pressure), SpaceX had their Falcon 9 just… turn off. This had two effects. As planned, on board software correctly processed sensor and system data to recognize the problem, and released the Dragon Crew Capsule and fired its Draco Engines to get it the hell out of there. The next thing that happened was the unpowered and now unstable rocket, as planned, exploded in a very dramatic way. The jettisoned capsule accelerated away with a maximum acceleration of 3.4 g. This is significantly easier on the body than what astronauts experienced during a necessary abort of a Soyuz capsule in October 2018.
After the Crew Dragon reached a maximum altitude of around 25 miles or 40 km, the capsule began its safe journey home, with all parachutes deploying as planned, concluding with a safe splashdown into the ocean. This successful test prepared the way for a crewed launch sometime this year.
In a press conference following the abort test, there was a clear attempt to maintain a single narrative between NASA administrator Jim Bridenstein and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk; Musk even stated they’d agreed on messaging prior to appearing, roughly 15 minutes late, on the press conference stage.
Musk made it clear that SpaceX should have hardware delivered by the end of February or at worst early March, and ready for launch shortly thereafter. Bridenstein, on the other hand, stressed the desire for additional tests of the parachute system on the Crew Dragon, and said that NASA is going to be rethinking how to use this new hardware. Specifically, they will consider if they’d like to change their current plan to have a short mission to the ISS, and instead have the astronauts stay for an extended period. That latter option would require additional astronaut training, and would delay launch by an unknown amount of time. Many of us wonder why NASA didn’t already provide training for both kinds of missions — long or short — and some question if this is a delaying tactic to allow Boeing and its Atlas launched Starliner a chance to catch up in development (recall they had an unsuccessful trip to the ISS in December).
Bridenstein was extremely clear that NASA wants to have multiple suppliers of human space launch services, and continues to publicly back Boeing and United Launch Alliance. In December, when our Daily Space team visited Kennedy, we found that the information given during facility bus tours actually stressed these older companies and talked about how it would be Boeing that returned Americans to space from American soil. Since NASA is a government funded agency, there are complex politics behind every public message — messages often designed to keep the congress people who write the budgets happy. As we watch the similarly politically motivated actions in the following months, we will be playing close attention to see if Boeing is required to put their capsule through the same tests and experiences the same timeline delays as we’re seeing for SpaceX.
I am a fan of a take it slow, test everything, and move forward boldly kind of approach, but we want to see fairness in how these two companies are allowed to advance their technologies.
Let’s look at the facts: SpaceX has had a successful launch to the ISS, numerous successful parachute tests, pad abort tests, and now a successful mid launch abort test. They are being asked for potentially more testing of their parachutes. On the other side, Boeing had a parachute not deploy during their on-the-ground abort test, and announced that landing on 2 of 4 parachutes was deemed a success and their schedule would not be effected. They also had an unsuccessful launch to the ISS that is being called a success because they had their capsule return to Earth just fine. Currently, we see plans for a June 2020 launch with three people, and a subsequent launch planned with 4 people in December. These 7 humans will each cost more to launch on these Boeing capsules than they would cost to launch in the proven Russian Soyuz capsules.
SpaceX? While all flight-tests have so far been successful, they did have a fuelling accident related to an engine test that resulted in the loss of the capsule originally planned for this weekend’s in-flight abort test. Their parachutes have consistently worked, they have consistently flown to the ISS, and the Falcon 9 rockets are showing they can fly over and over from location after location. Currently, we see plans for a possible April launch with 2 astronauts, but NASA is saying this could be delayed. We also see plans for a July launch with 3 astronauts and no other flights planned for 2020. These 5 astronauts will launch at a substantially lower cost than what is currently being spent on Soyuz capsules.
Currently, NASA has orders in to fly astronauts on 6 additional Starliner and 6 additional Crew Dragon capsules in 2021 and beyond. In the coming months, I hope to see both companies included side-by-side in discussions of our nations’ reborn human space program. I hope see the same tests from both companies, and discussions on how to get costs under control. I hope for fairness. I hope, but I’m not optimistic, but I will be here watching and reporting on what we see happen.
Many people want to find a good recipe or a means for constantly raising tone and health in life. ?nd one tool helped me that I have been using for about a year with great enthusiasm I would like to advise you too, because it brought me a lot of benefit and my loved ones https://108.health/ just give it a try and start using it now. A lot of people have already left their good reviews which I think can be expected from you.
That latter option would require additional astronaut training, and would delay launch by an unknown amount of time.
I recently saw a fascinating article, which shows, for example, 48 hours in days, https://craft-sweden.com/how-long-is-48-hours/ how many days in a day, in minutes, and so on. You can calculate the time which will be very useful for many people.
Bridenstein was extremely clear that NASA wants to have multiple suppliers of human space launch services, and continues to publicly back Boeing and United Launch Alliance.
– foundation contractors worcester ma
I visited one site where I found out how old is celebrity http://howoldiscelebrity.com/ Snoop Dogg is, and also read interesting information about this rapper, whose music I have been listening to for a long time. On this site, there are many more interesting facts about various popular people.
Their parachutes have consistently worked, they have consistently flown to the ISS, and the Falcon 9 rockets are showing they can fly over and over from location after location.
Whatever the result would be, Science would benefit from it.
Junk Removal Near Me
This would be great for humanity. Thanks for sharing this update.
Junk Removal near me
They are being asked for potentially more testing of their parachutes. On the other side, Boeing had a parachute not deploy during their on-the-ground abort test, and announced that landing on 2 of 4 parachutes was deemed a success and their schedule would not be effected.
I think it will I mean they are both billionaires why cheat? by the way if you need Drywall and Sheetrock Installation Just check my site
I think the space will be fair enough
the space race should be fair but it will be interesting to watch
Great post! Thanks for the share.
Looking forward to more awesome articles from this site.
That latter option would require additional astronaut training, and would delay launch by an unknown amount of time.
It’s great to see this awesome post here.
They also had an unsuccessful launch to the ISS that is being called a success because they had their capsule return to Earth just fine.
Boeing and SpaceX are also both contractors under NASA’s Commerical Crew Program. However, NASA awarded Boeing a higher-value contract — $4.3 billion compared to SpaceX’s $2.5 billion.
Bridenstein was extremely clear that NASA wants to have multiple suppliers of human space launch services, and continues to publicly back Boeing and United Launch Alliance.
Thank you for sharing this
Call our clinic today to schedule your teeth whitening and flash your wonderful smile, because we know you deserve to have whiter teeth.
Go spaceX! Great news, thanks for the share
Garage Heaters
I am excited to see more of the Boeing Space X!
used kenworth trucks for sale
This is awesome! Thanks for this great article you shared. https://www.plainviewfamilydentistry.com/
Would love to see more posts from this site. Nice content! https://www.fdglubbock.com/
Your blog held my interest right to the very end, which is not always an easy thing to do!!
Amazing how far we’ve come technologically. This is amazing!
For good and bad reasons, capitalism is a thriving feature of the US culture so it seems appropriate that multiple companies would be vying for chance to become the next dominate space company. It will be amazing to see what happens over the next decade or two. Welder near me
Glad to see this awesome article here.
Ahh! This is soo beautiful and nice. The design is truly accurate to my expectations.
http://www.ohiotrucks.com
Great work! Thanks for sharing.
Wow, this is so pretty cool. Thanks for posting
Great article! Does not matter who wins the race. This is for mankind!
– Roofing Services
Good data posted! Thanks
Good data! Thanks https://careers.tql.com
Amazing article. Does not matter who wins first place, everyone’s a winner!
Custom Metal Railings
I hope it isn’t fair, or at least fair is the wrong word to use! Isn’t that the purpose of capitalism, that fairness only means how hard one works. I like to believe the winner deserves their place but regulation has its purposes. Then again, no one should listen to me. I jsut comment what I feel like. Speaking of which, you guys commenting a lot like me can feel free to post your comments here – it’s a site that allows comments like this one, a win win with good DA but keep it hush lol.
A December 2019 test launch went wrong when the Starliner separated from its rocket but failed to orient itself into the correct orbit due to a clock fault. They canceled an August 2021 test before takeoff due to a valve issue identified by personnel.
Woah! This is so good. Thanks
Wow. This is one of a kind. Great work.
lakewood mold removal
Glad to check this site again, awesome one. https://calldoctorclean.com/
SpaceX has been making a lot of great improvements and advancing so far.
I think SpaceX is more advanced and more daring today. Great job on both
Roof Repair
Spectacular!
Mae | footer repair
Indeed, SpaceX is the future of spaceflight.
Woah! This is so great. Keep it up
The next thing that happened was the unpowered and now unstable rocket, as planned, exploded in a very dramatic way. https://marcoislandbikerentals.com/
I want to save this information! Thanks
It is fair I guess. They have been waiting for it to happen.
Looking forward to the future of space travel. Please visit this website if you’re interested with plumbing services, https://www.plumbinggrandeprairieab.com/.